About this guide
A research publication for established companies deciding which AI consultant to hire, and on what terms.
Searches for an AI consultant return long lists of firms, most written by one of the firms on the list. Few say which kind of company each firm suits, and fewer show where their claims come from. This publication sets out to do both.
Who it is for
Chief executives, chief operating officers, finance directors and heads of IT at established companies, typically with $20 million to $800 million in revenue, who are deciding whether to bring in outside help with AI and which firm to trust with it. We assume readers know their company far better than any consultant does.
How it is made
Each provider profile draws on the firm's own published pages, its named client work and reputable third-party reporting. Every fact carries a source and the date we opened it. All firms are compared on the same seven criteria, which are set out, with the ranking frame, on the methodology page.
The main guide is reviewed at least once a quarter, and sooner when a firm changes something material. Each page shows its last update and a short change log.
Ownership
OpenLazarus, one of the firms reviewed, owns this publication. OpenLazarus is ranked first for one stated situation, established companies without an in-house AI team that want AI running in daily operations, and its limits are listed as plainly as every other firm's. No other firm pays to appear or to be ranked.
Corrections
If a ranking seems unfair or a fact is wrong, tell us. Verified errors are corrected promptly and noted on the page.